Thoughts on Dr. King and National Service

by Trish Kahle (appeared on her blog: I Can't Believe We Still Have to Protest This Shit)



I often wonder what Dr. King would think about his holiday, and especially what he would think about it being branded as a 'National Day of Service.'

While it's true that Dr. King was one of the great leaders of the Civil Rights movement, when the white government was looking for a Black person to give a holiday to, they chose him over so many others--Malcolm X, Angela Davis, Medgar Evers. And since Dr. King never once gave into white pressure or demands, we must ask ourselves why.

The surface reason--or what the white elite will give you for a reason--is that he was a great man (which he was) who promoted equality and peace (which he did). Then they proceed to pare down the life an extraordinary man to the one great speech, 'I Have a Dream.'

The real reason they chose Dr. King to 'honor' was because they thought that over time, his struggle could be rebranded as something less dangerous. Half a century later, sit-ins and marches hardly seem that earth shattering to most people--mostly because the nasty parts where the police gassed, beat, shot, and killed activists are glossed over or left out entirely. In fact, they almost make it seem as though Civil Rights were in their plans all along, and Dr. King was really just their puppet. Anyone who understands the nature of Dr. King's non-violence and civil disobediance knows that nothing could be further from the truth. But as fewer and fewer participants can give witness and the history books continue to ignore people's struggles, we are in danger of losing the truth forever, of being left with the 'dominant truth'--a 'truth' that is an outright lie.

And Dr. King's militancy certainly presented an easier spin project than Malcolm X's militancy. Instead of being portrayed as two great men whose ideas were coming closer and closer to convergence, King is propped up (as much as the white elite will ever prop up a empowered Black man) and Malcolm X is villified and made out to be a 'terrorist.' (Hmm...is this sounding a little too familiar yet?)

But as Dr. King said, when peaceful revolution becomes impossible, violent revolution becomes inevitable.

And now I come to addressing the 'day of service' notion.

Dr. King not only fought racial injustice, he fought poverty, imperialism, and capitalism. (But since those parts are 'dangerous,' we're encouraged to ignore them if we're taught them at all.) Considering this, I have a hard time believing that Dr. King would ever want us to commit ourselves in his honor and memory in service to a nation that half a century later is still racist, imperialist, and capitalist.

No. I think Dr. King would have us out in the streets marching, boycotting, and resisting today and everyday. It is a disgrace to his legacy and memory for us to become complicit in the system that he fought everyday. In the system that murdered him and so many others for their dissent and resistance.

If Martin Luther King, Jr. Day is really about serving our community--and not the government that oppresses us--then let's do it. The best way to serve the people--and ourselves--is to fight for our own power.

Imperialism, Racism, and Haiti

by Trish Kahle

When Haiti was rocked by a 7.0 magnitude earthquake that struck just outside Port-au-Prince, it shed light on the devastatingly poor nation--the poorest in the Western Hemisphere. Obama said that the United States would most certainly help Haiti in its hour of need. Well, Mr. President, I hate to break it to you, but it's been Haiti's hour of need for a while. You can point to the UN Peacekeeping mission of 9,000. You can point to the abysmally small aid packages already sent.

But not too long ago, Obama sent a $663.8 billion dollar defense budget to Congress for approval. Of course it will be approved. No one seems to mind killing people, directly or indirectly, however much it costs. And spending that same money to care for those people would of course never pass Congress. After all, there's little profit for companies like DynCorp, Halliburton, or Blackwater in that. Who do you think gives more money to Congressional campaigns--the disenfranchised, homeless woman or Blackwater?

It's frankly embarrassing to live in a country that will spend over $663.8 billion on what essentially boils down to murder. Imagine if that money had been spent building schools, bridges, levees, and other structures able to withstand natural disasters--not just in Haiti but in countries all over the world, including the United States.

The imperial message of the US is very, very clear. Don't conform to our policies? We'll attack. You're not white? We'll make bombs before we house you adequately. It's no coincidence that the people who live in the poorest areas on Earth are Black, Beige, and Brown. It's racism. Racism enforced by the American DoD. These people suffer every day, not just when natural disaster strikes, because the US government and other governments of the developing world would rather spend $52 billion on fighter jets that can't be flown in the rain than aid them.

This "natural" disaster, and others like them, are the indirect result of American imperialism and defense spending. Axe the military budget, and maybe we could kill two birds with one stone.